Showing posts with label 3. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 3. Show all posts

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Much, much reading.

You know, while you're sick or working as a computer lab monitor you can really get a lot of reading done! I'll begin with Flight...

Through visiting various comic artists' websites over the years, for example the likes of Vera Brogsol, Clio Chang, and my personal favorite Jen Wang, I found out about the Flight series. I've always been interested and I was happy to discover that my library at least had Volume 2 on the shelves! I had mistakenly thought it a single story, but in actuality it is a collection of unrelated comics done by various artists such as the aforementioned.

In Flight, Volume 2 there is a great variety of subjects; a little something for everyone, really. There are monsters, adventures, talking animals, animal heroes, people heroes, futuristic scenes, space scenes, nature scenes, city scenes, love interests, family stories... really, everything! I enjoyed at least 90% of its content, and what I didn't like I just skimmed over because nothing goes on for too long anyway. My only gripe would be minor writing problems, in that some of the stories ended far, far too abruptly. But the art is all fantastic and worth viewing no matter what the writing is like. And if you're a comic nerd like me it'll give you leads to artists you now like but didn't know about before! So check it out because you're bound to like something in it. OVERALL RATING: 5

I've finally completed my Sacco reading, that is unless he has more books that I am unaware of. This one includes the same amazing illustration work as Palestine and Gorazde, but it is a little less weighty in content. However, it doesn't make it any less respectable or any less interesting-- in fact, it was refreshing to be able to read through a Sacco novel with greater speed while still maintaining all the seriousness in subject and details in drawings. I had no idea what the title meant so I won't spoil the surprise for anyone else by giving away specifics. I will say though that it again captures the essence of a war-tired area of people who become an anthropological study in comic form via Sacco's perspective. What would YOU do if your country went to war and everyone lost nearly all sense of rationality? It's hard to say what anyone would do in that kind of situation, but Sacco provides one example in this book. Sometimes this is how it goes when there's war, so don't be shocked when there's plenty of violence and abnormal behavior. OVERALL RATING: 4.5

Pathetic people abound, Summer Blonde is filled with stories that make you simultaneously pity and loathe the lead characters. It's a collection of fictional stories set in modern times about people who want love (or something) but just can't quite make it.

It's kindof one of those books that leaves you with a weird taste in your mouth. Are these people sane or sick? They seem so real and so unappealing.

However, the art has the opposite qualities from its main characters-- it's lovely and has great continuity from frame to frame, in an almost cinematic quality. I'd recommend it if you're up for a modern story with a not necessarily happy ending. OVERALL RATING: 3

Now HERE's a graphic novel I really enjoyed. (I feel that I should make a disclaimer: I thoroughly enjoyed Flight and The Fixer, but I expected to, and so this one may get written about more passionately as a result.)

While the author did live in Mexico, the story in the graphic novel is not autobiographical of her life. Although the story is dramatic, it seems entirely plausible, which I liked. Rarely does a work of fiction seem so real; realistic ones are definitely common but there always seems to be an element of falsehood present. You know it's false, therefore its fictional qualities seem more evident. But in La Perdida, Jessica Abel tells the story so well that I didn't realize it wasn't true until I looked at the author's name about halfway through the book.

The drawings have a quick, sketchy quality that reminded me of an unpolished version of Craig Thompson's book, Blankets. It bothered me at first that there was this sense of roughness to the visuals but it made the story seem so real, like it could have almost actually been her diary while she was in Mexico. OVERALL RATING: 5

I am in the middle of reading what I think is Daniel Clowes' most popular work, Ghost World, but I feel educated enough to make the statement that his style feels quite similar to Tomine's. I'm not quite sure whether or not I even liked the main character. He's pathetic, yet confident, but likable?

Anyway, I found it interesting a storyline enough to read the whole novel if that says anything. But I'm not sure I like this kind of fiction. Somehow, it lacks a sense of humor and a sense of reality, a sense of being genuine even if the characters are total scumbags. I know that Clowes is supposed to be a brilliant comic artist so I won't get clouded by not liking just one book. Read it for yourself, the art is great at least! OVERALL RATING: 2

Thursday, February 12, 2009

A Blast from the Past: This Past Summer's Reading Adventures

I can't help but make note of a few books I read this summer since they were noteworthy because of one of three things: either greatness, boringness, or disturbingness.

I'll begin with disturbingness. Miranda July and I have a love-hate relationship. She might be genuine and bright, or she might just be hipster using brutal honesty to gain the appearance of being genuine and bright. I don't know. Whatever she is, this book is a collection of stories that use real life situations paired with a great deal of shock value. I appreciate the modern idea of writing without beating around the bush, without hiding the human flaws of the characters, and even indulging oneself in the bizarro world of fellow man-- but it just seemed like one huge attempt to shock, shock, shock. I admit, I enjoyed some of the storytelling at times, but it definitely wasn't my favorite book in the world. But keep trying Miranda, I like your ideas (mostly). I give you a 3 for middle-of-the-scale enjoyment. Also, I have this book in an orange cover, which is apparently impossible to find online.

The Great Gatsby is a classic, and based on the framework of the story and the ideas behind the book I can understand why it is considered such.

But did I enjoy it? No. It was actually a pretty torturous read, and if it hadn't been for sheer boredom I wouldn't have read any Fitzgerald after that for fear that the writing would be like it was in this book.

Feel free to claim whatever you want-- that I "just didn't get it" or I'm being too dismissive of classic material, but it just seemed incredibly long and boring in most parts. No matter how long I read (and I did read all of it) it just seemed like I couldn't touch the characters-- I couldn't get close to the story or have any particular attachment to its continuation. I read it all the way to the end thinking that just maybe there would be some final part that made me go "OHHH" but that moment never came. The characters weren't even all that likable if you ask me.

So, I give it maybe a 1, or maybe even a 1.5.